Monday, November 27, 2017

Ramayanam – a few thoughts 3

81. Hanuman counters three obstacles on the way in the form of mainaka mountain (sahaya satru –an obstacle in the form of help), surasa (created by the gods) and simhika, a demoness that captured beings by clutching at their shadow. A pouranika likened it to the three categories, aadibhutam (related to the five elements, mainaka), adidaivatam (related to supernatural power, surasa) aadhyatmikam (related to one’s own self, simhika who caught the shadow of Hanuman’s body).

 

82. In two places, we come across moral dilemma. Hanuman says to the deity of Lanka that he is a tourist on sight-seeing. Sita tells her demoness guards that she does not know who the monkey wreaking havoc in the neighbourhood was. That is part of life. No one leads a text-book life.

 

83. Some people try to give ingenious interpretation to some incidents. When Hanuman was quietened with brahmastra, the demons tied him with ropes and Indrajit despaired that the effect of brahmastra would wear off because of such physical binding. My teacher explained how by tying a tighter knot, a previous knot would loosen. But, that does not appear to be the import here.

When the demons set Hanuman's tail on fire, he does not feel the heat. My teacher said that in the base of a flame heat would not be felt. But, the fire on the tail would certainly hurt the body parts closeby. The epic says Sita prayed to Agni and that is how Hanuman was spared. 

 

84. It is impossible to drive Aryan-Dravidian divide into Ramayana. To say that Ravana was a Dravidian is unfounded. Ravana was the direct descendant of Brahma. The description of Lanka is out and out in Vedic terms. The people chanted Vedic hymns and followed Vedic rites. As compared to Ayodhya, they were more into carnal pleasure. Lanka was an opulent city and the people lived a rich life. It came to grief because of the misdeed of the ruler. That happens all through history.

 

85. Hanuman sees the wives of Ravana in various states suggestive of eroticism. Hanuman considers whether he has committed a breach of morality in so doing, but is satisfied that since his mind was clear and pure, there was no impropriety. The lesson is that a mere physical condition is not profane by itself, but it is the state of mind which carries the vitiating influence.

 

86. Valmiki describes the various types of meat Hanuman saw in Ravana’s quarters: meats of deer, buffalo and boar; meats of peacock and chicken; meats of lamb, porcupine; meats of Krakara bird, Chakōra bird, wild buffalo, Ēkaṡalya fish and sheep. No mention of beef is found.

 

87. Depressed on not finding Sita after an elaborate search, Hanuman yields momentarily to despair, but re-energises himself and prays to gods for success. He also prays to Rama and Lakshmana:

नमोऽस्तु रामाय सलक्ष्मणाय देव्यै च तस्यै जनकात्मजायै।

नमोऽस्तु रुद्रेंद्रयमानिलेभ्यो नमोऽस्तु चन्द्रार्कमरुद्गणेभ्यः॥

A pouranika said that when Hanuman started he prayed to the sun, etc., but not to Rama, who is the Supreme, and soon after he included Rama in his prayer, he met with success. Bhagavathas cherish this sloka and add it in their prayer.

Ananda Coomaraswamy writes: “It should be understood that yoga ('union') is not merely a mental exercise or a religious discipline, but the most practical preparation for any undertaking whatever. Hanuman, for example, before searching the Asoka grove for Sita, ‘prayed to the gods and ranged the forest in imagination till be found her’; then only did he spring from the walls of Lanka, like an arrow from a bow, and enter the grove in the flesh.”

 

88. Ravana was an attractive person as described in Ramayana, and in his harem were many ladies who fell for him, apart from those whom he had abducted and subjugated. His appeal to Sita cites many reasons why she should agree to be the head of his harem:

      i.        My splendour is unparalleled.

    ii.        Youth is evanescent and will not come back once gone.

   iii.        You deserve the best of adornment and comfort. There is no reason to resign yourself to an ascetic life.

   iv.        I will conquer many regions and give over to Janaka.

    v.        Marrying another’s wife is in keeping with rakshasa dharma.

   vi.        Rama may even be dead and can never hope to redeem you. In any case, he is stripped of the crown and exiled.

  vii.        You will be at liberty to dispose of my wealth as you please.

To have been impervious to the arresting person of Ravana and his ostentatious wealth, called for a strong mind, and that is the glory of Sita.

 

89. Sita describes Rama as शरणागतवत्सलः. That is a key word for bhagavathas. It is the mother who tells children about the qualities of father. Children hear mother more. Sita plays the role of mother to people who are children to seek the kindness of Rama, the father. (This is typical Abrahamic imagery).

 

 

90. On the description of Rama by Hanuman to Sita, certain numbers are used. They correspond to the lakshanas in samudrika lakshanam (from readramayanam.org):

Sturdy three: chest, wrist and fist, symbols of royalty.

Long three: eyebrows, arms, testicles, symbols of opulence.

Symmetrical three: hair, testicles and shanks, also symbols of royalty.

Raised three: chest, navel and lower stomach, also symbols of royalty.

Reddish three: eye, nails and the pairs of palms and feet, symbolic of one who is born to enjoy life.

Silky three: the feet, hair, scrotum, symbolic of one who is born to be opulent

Imposing three: voice, gait and navel, symbolic of one who commands immediate respect.

The three places in which his figure was flat are breasts, nipples and lines.

The four parts in which his body was not oversized are neck, penis, back and shanks.

Three swirls in the hair on the head indicate that the person can manage and lead the entire earth.

The number of lines (folds) at the base of the thumb indicate the number of the Vēdas in which the person becomes an expert.

The number of lines (folds) on the forehead indicate the longevity of a person; one with a single line lives for twenty years, one with two lines lives for sixty years, one with three lines lives for hundred years and one with four lives for two hundred years.

One who has lines underneath the feet or in the palm in the shapes of Vajra, flag post, conch shell and a goad would become a lord of people.

Kishku is a measure of twenty four inches. Rāma is four Kishkus tall, or ninety six inches tall. One who is four Kishkus tall is considered an equal of Devas.

Symmetrical four are the arms, thighs, knees and shanks.

चतुर्दशसमद्वन्द्वः with the fourteen parts of his body (eyebrows, nostrils, eyes, ears, lips, nipples, elbows, wrists, knees, testicles, loins, arms, legs and buttocks) in good proportion,

पञ्चस्निग्ध: with five smooth parts (hair, eyes, skin, teeth and feet).

 

अष्टवंशवान् his eight parts of the body (backbone, trunk, limbs, fingers, toes, nose, eyes and testicles) are long.

दशपद्मः ten lotus-like limbs (eyes, face, mouth, tongue, lips, cheeks, nipples, nails, feet and hands).

दशबृहत् with ten well-proportioned limbs (head, forehead, ears, neck, chest, heart, belly, hands, legs, buttocks).

त्रिभिः covered with three aspects (splendour, fame and glory).

द्विशुक्लवान् two white limbs, teeth and eyes.

षडुन्नतः he has six elevated limbs (nose, shoulders, forehead, chest and arm pits). नवतनुः has nine fine features (moustache, nails, knuckles, beard, skin, hair, penis, acumen, perception).

त्रिभिः he pursues spiritual merit, worldly comforts and sensual delight in three periods forenoon, midday and evening of the day.

 

91. From the questions of Sita, it appears that they were receiving news of Ayodhya while in forest. Sita asks whether Bharata would be sending the forces to rescue her. Such a thought did not occur to Rama. He was on exile to fulfil his father’s word and nothing can make him commit an infringement.

 

92. Hanuman says that no one is as dear to Rama as Sita, not even his parents. This tradition is a long one and sanctified by avatars also.

 

93. Hanuman praises Sita, “Who other than you would spurn escape that involves touch with another’s body?” A teacher of mine said that the right name for the epic must be Sitayanam. From Hanuman’s comment it appears that women were not prudish in those days, Sita being extra cautious.

 

94. The episodes of Hanuman’s fight with the Rakshasas are perhaps the inspiration for the super feats we witness in films where one brave hero faces multiple opponents and overpowers them. May devotees pardon me.

 

95. Ravana was a great personality, attractive and powerful. “Seeing that dazzling lord of Rākshasas and stupefied by his radiance, Hanumān thought to himself: ‘Ah, what charm, what mettle, what power and what brilliance! How well every quality that there is, is blended in this king of Rākshasas!’”

 

96. Angada talks humbly to the monkeys and seeks their opinion on returning to Sugriva after seeing Sita (by Hanuman) as the monkeys were reveling. “Though I am the crown prince I will not order you who have accomplished the mission,” he says. The monkeys praise his magnanimity, “Who would ever speak thus, being a lord? Everyone, intoxicated with power, thinks, ‘It is all about me.’”

Politics has rarely been different perhaps, with exceptions forming the kernel of epics.

 

97. Rama praises Hanuman thus, “One who, assigned to a task that is next to impossible to accomplish, by his master, does it with zeal and interest, is said to be best among men.”

 

98. Hanuman mentions the strength of enemy forces in these terms:

“Big and powerful machines that shoot arrows and stones, formidable sharp-spiked machines”

“The bridges are protected by torrential pour (of arrows and stones) shot by machines located everywhere in the moats, from any attacking enemy forces.”

Rama cautions his forces thus: “The wicked Rākshasas might try to poison the fruits and roots and the water on the way. You should be ever-vigilant to guard against them.”

War has been the same ever since wars were fought perhaps.

 

99. Rama tells Lakshmana about missing Sita,

कदा नु चारु बिम्बोष्ठम् तस्याः पद्ममिवाननम् ।

ईषदुन्नाम्य पास्यामि रसायनमिवातुरः ॥

When will I lift her lovely lotus face, with its lips like Bimba fruit, and swill (its sweetness), like one does a life-giving elixir?”

 

100. Never mind who says it. It is Ravana, but he was a great and successful king, spoiled by covetousness.

“He who begins an enterprise after deliberating with well-wishing advisors capable of deciding a strategy, or with friends who share the same object, or with a good number of relatives, and further tries to invoke the blessing of Providence, is said to be the best among men.”

“The strategy arrived at after professional consultation and by consensus is the best. That which has diverse views, but arrived at by endorsement of one line is median. That which has diverse opinions and arrived at without agreement is the worst.”

 

101. Vibhishana advises Ravana in placatory tone to give back Sita. He says, ‘हितं पथ्यं इदं शृणु’. The two words are not directly translatable. Hitam is ‘good’ (though maybe unpalatable), pathyam is right (disciplined and not pandering to what is pleasing).

What does Ravana do? He rejects the advice. He addresses the consequence feared by Vibhishana. He says that he is all powerful and no one can conquer him.

There lies the definition of evil. Evil is belief in brute strength spurning propriety.

We have superpowers today that typify this definition of evil. They are ready, and have time and again translated that readiness, to suppress another nation or something that is opposed to their line of thinking.

 

102. Kumbhakarna was asleep when Ravana abducted Sita. When the consultation about the strategy was held to meet an attack by Rama, he told Ravana that the consultation must have preceded the abduction. He says, “He who does first what should be done later and later what should have been done first, has no sense of strategy.”

In my teens, I heard a pouranika narrating this imaginary episode to explain the incident in Ramayana: “A man held housewarming ceremony for the newly built house and in post-lunch session, he consulted the relatives, ‘A mistake has occurred. I bought a piece of land long ago. After building this house, I have received a notice that the site belongs to someone else. What should I do now?”

Kumbhakarna understood the severity of the transgression, but unlike Vibhishana, he stuck with Ravana.

 

103. The crudity and carnality of Rakshasas is brought out here: Mahaparswa tells Ravana, “O you of immense strength! Force yourself on Sitā like a cock does (itself on a hen) and enjoy her and sport with her.”

 

104. In the consultations, each one except Vibhishana gloats over past feats and encourages Ravana to fight and retain Sita. Vibhishana tells pointedly that an adviser worth his salt must assess realistically the strength of the rival sides and give impartial advice. We often go by past trends in predicting future, say, in loan proposals. Future disappoints us by a new turn.

 

105. Ravana retorts Vibishana and lists the undesirable traits of ज्ञातिs (siblings and cousins). “For it is these siblings and cousins that give the tips on how we can be taken captive. Danger from siblings and cousins for us is the worst and is the most-known of all dangers.” Interestingly, Vibhishana gives valuable tips to Rama.

 

106. Vibhishana is touched to the quick by Vibhishana’s stinging address and leaves him and says, “सुलभाः पुरुषा राजन् सततं प्रियवादिनः । अप्रियस्य तु पथ्यस्य वक्ता श्रोता च दुर्लभः ॥ It is easy to find, O king, people who always talk sweetly! But when it comes to bitter truths that are not so pleasing to the ears, it is hard to find one who would venture to say it and one who would be willing to listen.” How true!

 

107. Vinhishana Saranagati

This is a high point in Ramayana in bhakti for Bhagavatas. It has lessons in the art of consultation also. Vibhishana makes a truthful deposition about why he has come to सर्वलोकशरण्य, Rama, the refuge of the three worlds. Bhagavatas believe that surrender unto the Lord is emancipation.

While conveying the message of Vibhishana, Sugriva spells out reasonable doubts: 1. Rakshasas are cunning and cannot be trusted. 2. He is the brother of the enemy and why would he leave his brother at this hour?

Rama invites opinion of others who are duty-bound to give valuable advice to friends in critical moments. Angada sticks to Sugriva’s line (a diplomatic course also) that Vibhishana might play a confidence trick and hurt them badly later. However, he also says that if after examination, the positives outweighed the negatives, he must be taken. (That reminds us of economists, who are always ambidextrous, as some wise one said – no economist would give an opinion without ‘on the other hand’.)  Sarabha advocated sending spies to study and report on them. Finally, Hanuman gave his opinion. He had the advantage of knowing about Vibhishana. He prefaces his opinion with a statement of humility, that is well worth noting by speakers.

न वादान्नापि सङ्घर्षान् नाधिक्यान्न च कामतः ।

वक्ष्यामि वचनं राजन् यथार्थं राम गौरवात् ॥

I venture to speak what I genuinely feel only out of regard for you; but not to contradict (anyone), nor to profess something, nor to show my superiority, nor because I am just itching to speak.”

His opinion: “1. We cannot assess his trustworthiness without seeing him in action. 2. The suggestion to spy on him is impractical and counterproductive. He will become suspicious and lose confidence. We will lose a good ally. We cannot easily gauge the intention of someone by mere words. 3. He must have weighed the relative merits and demerits of the two sides and then taken a decision as a wise man. He must have seen the wickedness of Ravana and your virtuousness and then decided to be on your side. 4. He inspires confidence in me from his demeanour. 5. Taking quick and timely action is of the essence for success.”

Rama said, “I too have the same opinion. I will not reject someone who comes with a desire for friendship even if he has some faults.”

Sugriva continued to have reservation and said that his leaving his brother at the hour of difficulty raised doubts.

Rama said with a smile, “Sugriva shows maturity in his opinion. But, there is something subtle here. Brothers become estranged at the time of troubles. I suspect that Vibhishana is here on that count. We are not his clan and we have no rivalry. He might have come desiring to become king. He seems to be in fear. We must accept him. Everyone is not a brother like Bharata, a son like me, or a friend like you.”

Sugriva persisted, “He is the brother of Ravana and has come with a treacherous motive. He must be killed.”

Rama is firm. He says, “It does not matter whether he is good or bad. He can do me no harm. Kanva has said that one should not kill even an enemy who has sought refuge. Whether the person seeking refuge is in grief or pride, one should protect him even by giving his own life. I shall follow Kanva’s advice. My vow is this:  If anyone begs of me protection in absolute surrender, I give freedom from fear to all such beings.

सकृदेव प्रपन्नाय तवास्मीति च याचते ।

अभयं सर्वभूतेभ्यो ददाम्येतद् व्रतं मम ॥

If it is even Ravana, I will act as per my vow.”

It is the gospel of Bhagavatas.

That seals the issue.

 

108.  Numbers

100 x 100 000 = a Crore (10^7) (10 million)

100 000 crores = a Sankha. (10^12) (1 quadrillion)

100 000 Ṡankhas = a Mahāsankha. (10^17)

100 000 Mahāsankhas = a Vṛinda. (10^22)

100 000 Vṛindas = a Mahāvṛnda. (10^27)

100 000 Mahāvṛndas = a Padma. (10^32)

100 000 Padmas = a Mahāpadma. (10^37)

100 000 Mahāpadmas = a Kharva. (10^42)

100 000 Kharvas = a Mahākharva. )10^47)

100 000 Mahākharvas = a Samudra. (10^52)

100 000 Samudras = a Ogha. (10^57)

100 000 Oghas = a Mahaugha. (10^62)

 

 

109. “When Dharma overwhelms Adharma, it will be the age of Kṛta.  When Adharma overwhelms Dharma, it is the age of Tishya (Kali).”

 

110. Vibhishana to Sugrive when Rama and Lakshmana lie unconscious after being hit by Indrajit’s arrows:

एवं प्रायाणि युद्धानि विजयो नास्ति नैष्ठिकः॥

This is what happens in a fight; there is no guarantee of a victory.

सत्यधर्माभिरक्तानाम् नास्ति मृत्युकृतं भयम्॥

One who is invested in truth and Dharma would not have any fear from death.

 

Ramayana: All characters speak same chaste Samskrit. For poetry this may be required. Across borders only one language is spoken. There are contradictions aplenty. Lakshmana is talked of as akritadwatah- unmarried by Rama when he addresses Surpanakha, not as ‘thaniaka irukkiran,’ as translated by Rajaji and glossed over by devotees. A few chapters earlier, Sita talks of Lakshmana’s marriage to Urmila. Rama does not talk untruth even in jest, a chapter earlier we are told. So it cannot be ‘summangatti.’


Monday, October 23, 2017

Happiness

October 24, 2017 ·
Happiness
It is a widely held belief, if not universally, that happiness is the goal of life. The idea of happiness and its centrality to life is a product of human mind and civilisation.
The word ‘happiness’ is used to denote many subtly different things.
Happiness can be emotional or intellectual, arising from feelings or thought.
Happiness, to my mind, may be in three different ways:
One is from simple gratification of the senses. Mere eating gives a lot of happiness. Let us call this joy or pleasure.
Another is from pure state of mind. This is at first sight rather philosophical or intellectual, but it is not academic. The more we decide to be happy the more we will be. Many of the sources of unhappiness arise from non-existent situations or situations whose probability of occurrence is remote or eventualities over which we have no control. Let us say the state of mind happiness as happiness.
Spiritually, we talk of ananda and it is translated as happiness, but let us call it bliss. It is a condition or property of the soul. It is on a different plane.
To be sure, mind is involved in all the three.
Pleasure relates to expectation of sense fulfilment. It is obviously calibrated on the scale of expectation. The greater the expectation, the lesser the satisfaction. If the expectation is multidimensional and not narrowed down to a few things, the chances of deriving satisfaction are greater. People expect some sort of a trading profit. They want greater reward than warranted by effort. That happens fewer times than expected.
Is intelligence a source of happiness or unhappiness? Perhaps, neither. By the definition or division that we have by convention and unwritten consensus, happiness is an emotional state and intelligence is connected with knowledge. Knowledge may give happiness, i.e. it affects us emotionally. It may make us unhappy also because of the value we attach to certain things and the risk to such things knowledge tells us about. Worrying and brooding are not signs of intelligence and should not be confused with a genuine search for knowledge based on experience and contemplation. Sometimes, some people may be impatient when another is rather slow at the uptake and that may produce irritation, but it is due to temperament and not intelligence.
As in everything else, whether we are happy or not depends largely on us, on what we are looking for, how in tune with life we are.



24/10/2018

Happiness is a state of mind and a choice. To have tried well and failed cannot make one unhappy. Being fully in what we are doing is the key to happiness, not the outcome.

I am glued to the Indian theory that success is determined not just by our efforts alone. As we mature, we do not let our poise and equanimity be disturbed by the outcome after unreserved and honest efforts, neither success is all due to us nor is failure the result of our incompetence.

The result of our effort is not determined by some non-descript past event, but by so many factors that have a bearing on the job. If an industry fails because of some sudden policy change or new taxation, we cannot blame the industrialist. He could not have controlled it unless he was an ambani. We cannot say that he should not have started the industry or that he should have had a plan B. If we can cover all risks, the industry must be doomed to fail from day one. It is a wrong set of mind to think that we should keep quiet because other factors also have a bearing on the result. We have seen this happen, sort of, in our asking the staff to come in time. Surely, head office was an uncontrollable external factor, but to have stopped to even expect that the staff should come in time is a criminal failure. Despite the best efforts, one may fail. Instances of individual success cannot prove anything. More things fail than succeed. That should not be the barometer of happiness. To be engaged in action with a good end in view with one's body, mind and heart is the natural thing to do and we must do it in a happy frame of mind and we must continue with that happy frame whatever happens. It may not happen, then we should introspect and improve.


7/10/18
Go to yourself for happiness and salvation.
A Jagadguru said, "The whole world is my guru." He uttered a profound truth. He was self-effacing and godly. (A person can be godly, not god).
The world is the only god and the only guru. It grants us all the boons and teaches us all the lessons.

Dec 17, 2005

Everyone gives a way to be happy. Happiness is touted as the chief aim of life. No one denies that happiness is a desired state, but the problem is when it is stated as the objective.

Hindu thinking perhaps was different. In Vishnu sahasranamam, in the palasruthi, it is said: “By reciting the slokas,

 A Brahmin will get the wisdom of Vedanta,

 A Kshathriya will be victorious,

 A Vaisya will get wealthy and

 A Sudra will get comforts (sukham).”

The objective of all people is not one and the same. Material comfort is not preferable to other goals for all individuals. It does not mean that one pursuit is superior to another. Different people have different urges. The dharma varies. The nature varies. Life is pluralistic. It is not a strait jacket. 

Jun 16, 2006

We all tend to share our misery. That is why the world is so full of misery. If we share our happiness, it will be full of happiness.


Sep 9, 2006

All our problems arise when we look at others. We get justice, happiness when we look at ourselves.

Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Ramayanam – a few thoughts - 2

48.  Rama exposes the fallacy in what Jabali has said in good intention. “You sound as though you are talking for my good, but you are not. A man of broken character, who violates custom and indulges in sinful acts, would never earn the respect of right minded people. It is one’s sustained behaviour that indicates whether one is pure or not, of great lineage or not, and a true Veera or just a pretender. If I renege on my pledge, how can I expect to attain heaven? What example would I be setting? As the kings do, so do the subjects. The essence of governance is enforcing truthfulness. Truthfulness is the very foundation of the society. I will follow the truth come what may and carry out my father’s wish, which I have pledged to do.”

Jabali clarifies that he did not advocate nastikya and that what he said was out of love and consideration for Rama.

Vasishta gives a good chit to Jabali and tells Rama that in his lineage primogeniture was the tradition and he should honour it. While parents give birth to a child, Acharya gives wisdom and is therefore called guru. His word is worthy of respect and following the advice of his (Vasishta is Rama;s guru), he would not be committing any sin. By doing good for the elders and the subjects, he would be upholding dharma. Attending on his aged and bereaved mother, he would be doing his duty. Rama would have none of it. He politely replies, ‘I owe my existence to my father and I cannot think of violating his order. What parents do cannot be requited.”

49. Bharata is dejected. He wants to go on hunger-strike in protest. Possibly, the idea was first documented here! Gandhi may not be the patent-holder for it! Rama quotes the rule book and says a Brahmana may do such things, but not a Kshatriya. Bharata then tries to rouse the public to make Rama return. But, they turn it down. Rama, they say, stands by truth and he would not budge. Bharata does not yet give up. He offers substituted performance. He would live in the forest for fourteen years. ‘Leaving no stone unturned’ is the most apt for Bharata. Rama is wonder-struck. But, there was no way he would yield. He says, ‘What Kaikeyi asked for was right to her. What my father agreed to was right for him. It would be wrong for me to let another person to undergo the rigour of compliance with the order of exile. I shall make my father’s word stand true. Bharata is a great soul. Everything will turn out well for him. I will return after fourteen years and take over the reins.”

 

50. Sita is troubled by Rama’s promise to protect the Rishis against the Rakshasas. She reasons with Rama, ‘There are at least three indulgences one should avoid: perjury, adultery and unprovoked violence. I am sure you steer clear of the first two meticulously, but your undertaking to use arms against the Rakshasas who have not crossed your path appears to fall in the third sin. It is alright for a king to bear arms to protect the citizens, but for one who is on penance in the forest where is the need for arms except in self-defence? You must resume your Kshatriya dharma after going back to Ayodhya. You know better and do what strikes you as right.’ Rama appreciates the fine point made by Sita and is proud of her active interest in his following the right course. He replies, ‘You yourself have said that it is the duty of the kings to protect the innocent. The Rishis have made a fervent plea about the atrocities committed on them and I had to assure them protection. It is now my duty to uphold it.’ This part of Rama’s character to protect those that seek his help is again seen when Vibhishana switches sides. In fact, Rama cites in defence of killing Vali that he did it to render justice as a representative of Bharata, the ruler.

51. Surpanakha berates Ravana when she goes to report the wholesale destruction of his clan at Janasthana. She brings out several aspects of what a king should or should not do. Says she, ‘People do not give much regard to a ruler who is selfish, indulges in base luxuries and goes about as his fancy dictates. The king who does not attend to his affairs personally in a timely manner perishes. Kings, who have no control over themselves and do not take care of their kingdom, count for nothing. The rulers who do not have control over their exchequer, spies and strategy are no different from commoners. The rulers are reputed as farsighted when they see, by gathering intelligence, everything that matters even when it lies far away.’

 

52. Surpanakha scolds Ravana for being infatuated in bodily pleasures, but incites him to indulge in the same by suggesting abduction of Sita. It is a sort of dramatic irony. She knows Ravana’s weakness and exploits it to take revenge on Rama who rejected her. Ramayana is a great epic that throws in focus how kama can manouevere people. We saw Dasaratha as a victim. Ravana is another who takes down his entire race because of his lust. Surpanakha paves the way for that because she was love-smitten, but was spurned. There is no need to see a divine scheme in all this. It is perfect human folly at play alongside virtue. The epic is a lesson as to what can go wrong and what should be done about it.

 

53. Maricha says to Ravana a golden lesson, “It is always easy to find people who talk sweet. But when it comes to what is good but not so pleasing to the ears, it is hard to find anyone who would venture to tell and anyone who would be willing to listen.” But, Ravana tells him curtly, “I did not come to you for advice, I came for help.” This is also a fitting lesson. We find ourselves in a similar situation in ordinary life. People rarely look to us for advice, something we have in abundant supply. To desist from advising others (FB excepted) is a worthy practice.

Maricha says, “A king who is reckless and treads on the wrong path should be restrained by well-meaning counselors in every possible manner.” There is a KuraL which has the same import: “Idippaarai illaadha aemaraa mannan

Keduppaar ilaanum kedum. Without courageous counselors to point out his fault and so protect him, a king will ruin himself, even without foes.”

Maricha says how all his subjects will be destroyed because of his sin, and how true! “Even those who are pure and have committed no sin, will get destroyed for the sins of others, like fish in a pool that is inhabited by snakes. Many a good man who followed Dharma and Yōga has perished along with his kith and kin, because of the offences of someone else.” Those who are exercised by the question of evil and find solace in some scriptural promise of reward and punishment must ponder how such things happen at random and wantonly.

 

54. Maricha talks clearly how Viswamitra went to Dasaratha and got Rama to protect his sacrifice, and also how Kaikeyi’s intrigue led to Rama’s exile. There are several such instances that look unrealistic. How did they know such details?

 

55. Sita tells Ravana that Rama is twenty-five years old and that she is eighteen years old. This must be at the time of going on exile. The story that she was elder to Rama is not from Valmiki. Twelve years they spent together in Ayodhya, she says. That is Rama was thirteen and she was six at marriage.

 

56. Sita says, “My husband will come, bringing with him a variety of wild meats from his kill such as that of black striped deer, mongoose and boar.” Food is a matter of custom and availability.

 

57. Ravana shows Sita his opulence, vividly described by Valmiki. He tries to win her over by pointing out his prowess and wealth, Rama’s abject state being on exile, the invincibility of Lanka that was well surrounded by the ocean difficult to cross, and the fleeting nature of youth. He also had the cheek to say that her bad days of living in the forest are over and the time of enjoyment has commenced. Infatuated, he says that he will touch her feet with his head, which he has not done with any other lady. Ravana considers that with all the allurement on offer, he has won Sita over. He has subjugated many a woman this way by force. All this enhances the preciousness of Sita’s chastity, which she preserves single-mindedly. When she replies she puts a grass across and talks to the grass. She has been molested by Ravana, but that happened beyond her power. As for her own conduct, she wants to treat him as a blade of grass, and does not want to talk to him one to one.

 

58. Sita tells Ravana, ‘Life for you is as impossible as it is for an animal tied to the sacrificial post.” The fact was that animals were tied to the sacrificial post and killed as offering. It was believed that the animals would go to heaven. If Buddha fought against this and won, it is no wonder. 

A digression.

It is cruel, and I will come under instant fire, but I feel we should know what happened to get a right perspective why Buddhism and Jainism caught on. Sankara’s philosophy emphasizing why karma cannot give liberation has this background. The whole thing was practised for attaining to better worlds. Sankara, unlike the agnostic faiths, did not repudiate the scripture, but pointed out to the ephemeral nature of the gains by such karma.

I am quoting rather in parts, and anyone interested can read the well researched book ‘Ka’ by Roberto Calasso.

“With a rope around its neck, the horse and a black dog.. were pushed towards the pond near the sacrificial clearing. . When the dog was out of its depth and began to flounder, .. the son of a prostitute attacked the dog with a wooden club… the dog would try to lift its head .. again it was clubbed. Then the priest would push its already inert body between the horse’s hooves, ..

They let the horse to wander around at will. ..

The most distressing moment for the horse was ..when, having tied him to the sacrificial pole, they then tied a further twelve victims, goats for the most part, .. to various parts of his body, and the goats would writhe around and tug at him ..

They made the horse crouch down .. then strangled him with the linen drape. The other animals -hundreds of them- were strangled with cords. The word they used was samjapayanti, ‘they make it acquiesce.’ .. ‘When they make a victim acquiesce, they kill it.’”

The author describes in what may be felt as repulsive the subsequent ceremony where the wives of the king approach the dead horse and do certain things.

 

59. There is grim irony that Ravana places Sita, steeped in deep soka, in Asokavana!

 

60. Rama is in inconsolable anguish missing Sita. He is distraught and acts like mad. He asks the flora and fauna about Sita’s whereabouts. He was cheerful when he was told of exile and did not blame anyone, but loss of Sita brings ordinary human instincts. He wonders whether it was the true intention of Kaikeyi in sending him on exile. Says he, ‘O Sita, because of you, Kaikēyi, will now have her wish fulfilled.’ He later swears that he will destroy the mountains, rivers and rocks because they do not tell him where Sita is.

He says later, ‘Dharma did not prevail to save Sita as she was being carried off in the great Vana. Which power in this world stood up for my well-being, when Vaidēhi was being devoured or abducted? The lords of Dēvas are certainly disregarding me as a weakling because I am gentle, keep myself in control, try my best for the good of the world, and show compassion.’ When a personal tragedy strikes, our belief in dharma is shaken. Rama is no exception. Valmiki also brings out beautifully through Rama in distress how goodness is mistaken for weakness. In his fit of rage, that is fully justified, he vows to take it out on all. That is the reaction in the first blush any ordinary human being would put forth. But, Rama was Rama and he would not carry into action a rash utterance.

Why did a hero, portrayed as noble and placed on a pedestal, behave so abjectly? Valmiki does not go into analysis. But, Vyasa finds a reason in Srimadbhagavatham: ‘That is to show the plight of those who are in mental knot with a woman.’

 

61. Even in that colossal grief, Rama thinks of dharma, while wailing, ‘I can’t live without Sita, and seeing me in the other world, my father will ask me how I went there without fulfilling his word.’

 

62. Here is a piece of poetic fancy. To Rama’s miserable plea to Godavari to tell him about the whereabouts of Sita, Valmiki says, ‘Thinking of the form and deeds of the evil minded Rāvaṇa, the river was gripped with fear and did not say anything about Sita.’

 

63. Without Sita, Rama says that his nights will be longer. Night, dark and cruel as it were, accentuates worries, pain and grief.

 

64. How did Rama choose to go southward in search for Sita? Lakshmana says, ‘Since the deer, questioned by you about Sita, rose up at once and pointed to the southerly direction, we shall do well to go that way; we may find a clue or even see her.’ They had further clue in the row of flowers strewn as they proceeded. Then they saw the giant footprint of Ravana and the small ones of Sita. They also saw the broken bow, chariot, etc. and then Jatayu. Uncharitably, even uncharacteristically, but perhaps understandably in his hour of grief of separation under sombre conditions, Rama suspects that the bird might have eaten Sita. Jatayu informs him that both Sita and his life have been snatched by Ravana. Jatayu ends his narration saying, ‘I do not deserve to be killed by you.’ Having heard from

Jatayu his valiant effort to prevent Sita’s abduction, he is filled with remorse. He curses his fate and says that having lost the kingdom, Sita, and now the friendly bird, he carries ill-luck with him like nobody else. A typical mood of human despondency in those trying times!

 

65. Here, Rama and Lakshmana play dummy reversal! Rama is in anger like Lakshmana when the order of exile is issued to Rama. Lakshmana reminds Rama of his nobility and counsels patience and effort to trace Sita and punish the really guilty, not the entire world. That is how life proceeds in a civilized society. Someone will blow the fuse now and then, and others have to douse the fire. Lakshmana says didactically for us, ‘If you cannot bear this grief, what about an ordinary man of average capabilities?’ That is the essence and purpose of this great story. Lakshmana quotes misfortunes suffered by other great people and inherent in nature. Such things occur and defy moral victory apparently. Lakshmana sets in bold relief the theory of fate, ‘It is difficult to know the virtues and flaws of actions that are not yet tried. Yet, without taking some action or the other, we cannot gain what we wish for.’ Human endeavour is supreme, but what is in store is never clear to us. To try is our dharma.

Lakshmana says, “सदा त्वं सर्वभूतानाम् शरण्यः परमा गतिः । O Rāghava! You are the ultimate refuge for all creatures.” Bhagavathas see reference to divinity in Rama in such passages.

Rama took the advice of Lakshmna who though was the younger.

 

66. कालो हि दुरतिक्रमः : This recurs in the epic. It is translated as ‘Fate can hardly be conquered.’ Kala has many meanings, but basically it is time. As march of time brings death, it also means Yama. Death is a function of time and time marches on bringing apparent changes. The march of time is inexorable, something that cannot be stopped or overcome. The fait accompli of time is fate. The past that is gone is not retrievable. Fate is just that, plus something more. In what has happened, there is a hidden future waiting to unfurl. To give a crude example, the diabetes that is in the gene is waiting to manifest under right conditions. Karma is that hidden future. But, there is yet scope for effort and redemption, remedy and cure. All future is not pre-determined, just that part which has got imbedded by past action that has left a potentially viable residue. It is unwise to blame on fate all that happens.

 

67. Pointing out how the eagle left its kith and kin, with whom it lived for thousands of years, gave up its life for his sake, Rama generalizes beautifully, and that is the bliss in life which we come across when our minds are open, “Everywhere, even among the lesser creatures, are to be found good souls that adhere to Dharma, who are valiant and the refuge of the weak and helpless.” We have heard stories of how dogs serve faithfully and how even some wild creatures show compassion. Only terrorists, like Ravana, are the inevitable exception.

 

68. Rama says, and there is no need to infer any exaggeration here, ‘Even the grief of losing Sita is secondary to me before losing this noble friend of my father, who is as good as my father.’ Rama does terminal rites for Jatayu which he could not do for Dasaratha. My teacher, a Srivaishnavite, saw in this a divine dispensation in that Dasaratha followed the lesser dharma disregarding the higher one (Rama being god) and so lost out on the rites being performed by him. Jatayu helped Rama (God) and was honored with the rites being performed by Rama. That is a way of interpretation by Bhagavatas. I am content to see just humanity in action. How did Rama give pinda to Jatayu? ‘He killed a deer, scooped out its meat, and turned into balls, and offered them to (the spirit of) the bird.’

 

69. In many places, portents, good or bad, are described before some major event. The belief that nature sends out signals of something imminent and momentous seems to have been rooted well in those times. It continues despite several duds. 

Ramayana has several interpolations. Even after ignoring them, the supernatural element is unavoidable. Those who have absolute faith take it literally and worship Rama as god and all the feats and incidents as divinely enabled. Those whose faith is not as strong can view it as a story, but the grandeur, relevance and chastening effect of reading Ramayana are irresistible and valuable. It has shaped along with Mahabharata the mindset of Indians for a long time, more than Vedas which were elitist and have practically gone into oblivion. 

Rajaji chose to narrate these two epics because of its hold on people and their influence in steering people to an ethical way of life, understanding that in the workaday world slips are unfortunately inevitable, but are not justifiable. 

 

70. Rama tells Lakshmana describing the beauty of spring in Risymuka hill on the banks of Pampa, with many a lake around, how his separation from Sita torments him at the sight of the romantic setting. The poetic fancy of Valmiki is explicit in, ‘The tree tops everywhere are loaded with flowers and are held in tight embrace by the climbing vines which themselves have burst into bloom. Look at that peahen, mad with love, joining in step with her dancing husband. 

And the peacock, full of love and with his lovely feathers spread out, follows her running, with cries that seem to make fun of her. Assuredly no Rākshasa has carried off the beloved of the peacock from the forest, and so he can dance with his beloved in the beautiful woods. It is very difficult for me to live without Sita in this month of bloom. Look how impassioned even the simpler forms of life are; even the peahen importunes her mate, impelled by desire. Jānaki would have come to me likewise, all aflutter with her longing for love, if only she had not been carried off. The sight of this Kāraṇḍava bird splashing in the pleasant water and playing with its mate inflames my desire.’ The epic is explicit in describing srngara. 

  

71. How should one talk? We get to know it from Rama’s praise of Hanuman’s speech of introduction: ‘His talk, neither verbose nor ambiguous, neither too slow nor too hurried, came from his chest through the throat with ease, pitched in medium tone. His pronunciation is well-cultivated and amazing. It is awesome and paced well, captivating the heart.’

 

72. An Acharya is one who unites two people. Actually, in the spiritual sense, he unites the jivatma of his sishya with paramatma. Anyone who thus unites two people is an Acharya. My teacher explained how Hanuman played the role of Acharya in three instances. He unites Sugriva and Rama as friends. He then unites Vibhishana and Rama in what Bhagavatas celebrate as saranagati. Then finally, he unites Sita and Rama, the separated couple; it is symbolic of the union of Jivatma, separated from Paramatma, with Paramatma.

 

73. Lakshmana says to Hanuman after briefing him on the background of their arrival in Risyamuka, ‘अहं चैव हि रामश्च सुग्रीवं शरणं गतौ ॥ Rāma and I seek refuge in Sugriva.’ The word saranam is used even in the context of Rama seeking the help of Sugriva for finding out Sita and getting her back. Lakshmana in fact waxes eloquent about Rama’s being the sole refuge of the world, but having to seek refuge in Sugriva. 

 

74. On seeing the ornaments shown by Sugriva as dropped by Sita while Ravana overflew Risyamuka while abducting her, Lakshmaṇa says, ‘I do not know the bracelets nor the ear-pendants; but I know the anklets, as I used to prostrate myself at her feet every day’. This is another sloka cherished by Bhagavatas. One can sense the deep anguish Sita’s suspecting him caused Lakshmana.

 

75. Tara, wife of Vali, is one of the wise women of mythology. There is a saying, ‘அஞ்சிலே ரெண்டு பழுதில்லே.’ (Two out of five are faultless). My teacher explained that it referred to Pativratas (chaste women). The five are Sita, Ahalya, Draupadi, Tara and Mandodari. Sita was abducted, Ahalya fell for Indra and Draupadi was married to five people. Only Tara and Mandodari have been absolutely pure, he would say.

Later, Vali commends her to Sugriva like this, ‘Tara is an expert in pursuing the core purpose and in gauging every impediment that could arise from any direction. Whatever she advises as appropriate should be done without hesitation, for nothing ever happens different from what Tārā foresees’.

Tara advises Vali not to accept the second challenge from Sugriva, for he must have strong support to come again after having run away. She has heard of Rama and praises Rama and this is included in prayer by devotees:

निवासवृक्षः साधूनाम् आपन्नानां परा गतिः।

आर्तानां संश्रयश्चैव यशसश्चैकभाजनम् ॥

He is the tree under which good people find shelter. He is the recourse for people in hardship. He is the refuge for those who are distressed. He alone is the place where renown can be found.”

She counsels Vali to coronate Sugriva as prince and bring about rapprochement. Vali rejects her with valid reason, “It is the duty of a warrior to accept a challenge to fight. Rama is a just man. How will he do something sinful?” But, the well-meant advice to patch up with Sugriva and be in the good books of Rama does not appeal to him. He paid by his life for rejecting it.

Later, when the angry Lakshmana visits Sugriva, Sugriva feels it expedient to field Tara before Lakshmana so that he could be assuaged before Sugriva faced him. Tara fulfils the role expected of her admirably.

 

76. Vali is described in glowing terms by Valmiki on being slain and fallen. The arrow from Rama was his visa to heaven, says the poet. His fall is likened to the fall of the sun at the end of a eon. That is interesting. Science says now that there is an expiry date for the sun, though in some distant future. The ancient Indians seem to have had an inkling of it.

Valmiki calls Vali’s reproof of Rama as परुषं धर्मसंहितम्, harsh and clothed in dharma. The poets are impartial, comments Rajaji. Vali reasons:

(i)   What have you achieved killing me when I was fighting with somebody else?

(ii)  I counted on your virtues and entered into the duel with Sugriva, spurning my wife’s advice. Not seeing you, I assumed that you would not attack me, as I was engaged with another one.

(iii)  I have done no harm in your realm or city, nor put any slight upon you, nor engaged in direct combat with you, nor committed any sin. Why should you kill me, a Vānara dwelling in the Vana, living on fruits and roots, while I was engaged with another?

(iv)  We are animals that roam in the Vana. What could you possible covet, in the Vana or among my possessions? My skin is not fit to be worn by good men, my hair and bones are taboo to them, and my flesh is not be eaten by those like you.

(v)   If you had fought with me face to face, you would have seen the god of death by now. (There appears no mention that Vali would get half the strength of the opponent in a direct fight and that is why Rama chose to kill him indirectly. But, Vali’s boast here may give a hint perhaps. In Uttara Kanda, which seems to be a later addition, Vali’s story appears in detail).

(vi)  Sugriva getting the kingdom after I go to heaven is right; but not your killing me abjuring Dharma in the fight.” 

Rajaji, a devout man of high standing with implicit faith, does not consider the explanation by Rama satisfactory.

 

77. Rama consoles the bereaved survivors of Vali. He says, “Nothing can be done once a person has passed away. It is नियति (cosmic order) which drives the world. Everyone is bound by it and acts under it according to one’s nature (स्वभावः). Time moves within its limit; neither it transgresses, nor can anyone overcome it. Vali has enjoyed the fruits of his action and has now attained a supreme destiny. You have cried enough. You must now get on with further things to be done.”

Those that live mourn the dead, it is the custom and cultural baggage, but it is for a while. The living have more pressing things to do than declare a lifelong mourning. No one has done it and it is wise. Let us care for the living, for ourselves too since we are living. When we are gone, let those that remain care for themselves and carry on.

 

78. Some 'rational' thoughts. We observe how when a monkey jumps, its body stretches, They jump fairly long spans deftly. The eagles have a keen eyesight that from so high in the sky they can espy a prey far below, swoop down and latch on to it in a precision move. Have these been magnified in the capacity of the monkeys to cross the ocean and the ability of Sampati to spot Sita miles away in Lanka? “It seems to me that even the wind cannot move here undetected.”

Normally, we use such exaggeration to describe the intensity of a situation or feeling. These might have been taken verbally to write accounts like Vayu, Varuna, etc. were slavish to the rakshasas.   

 

79. Sundara Kandam is a favourite with devotees. 'Sundara' was the pet name of Anjaneya, says a source. Anjaneya is the hero of Sundarakanda. It is self-contained with the mission being finding the whereabouts of Sita and that is achieved. He makes a pledge to get the job done and overcomes obstacles, despairs in not finding Sita first, and returns after having found her, reassured her and forewarned the rakshasas.

Hanuman thinks at every step how to accomplish Rama’s purpose and how to avoid foolishly hampering it. The qualities of Rama are praised again and again in it. Hanuman says Ramakatha to Sita and then to Ravana. Hanuman himself summarises Sundarakanda when he narrates to his companions how he found Sita.

Sita is in despair and wonders whether such sordid life is worth living. Hanuman talks wisely to her about the preciousness of life and how before long suffering will end, about the certainty of Rama rescuing her once he returns and reports her whereabouts.

The plot of this section has suspense, disappointment and delight, and valour.

 

 80. Hanuman prays to gods before taking off. The first deity is Surya. Why Surya first? A pouranika was imaginative. He said that Rama belonged to Ikshvaku dynasty that was in Suryavamsa. As Hanuman was going for Ramakarya, it was appropriate to invoke Surya’s blessings first. His own master, Sugriva, was Suryaputra. Surya is the prathyaksha daivata. Even ordinary folk invoke Surya as sakshi in their agitated moments. Hanuman himself had obtained boons from Surya.